A recent study exploring the dynamics between landowners and wildlife conflicts around Bandipur and Nagarahole National Parks has revealed a troubling trend: those who have experienced wildlife encounters are less likely to have a positive view of forests. Conducted by the Centre for Wildlife Studies (CWS), the study, titled “Contradictions in Conservation: Education, Income, and the Desire to Live Near Forest Ecosystems,” surveyed 699 landowners in a five-kilometer buffer zone surrounding the two protected areas.
The findings, as stated by CWS, indicate a striking correlation between negative wildlife experiences and the perception of forests. Landowners who faced conflicts with wildlife were found to be 116% less likely to enjoy living near forested areas and 67% less likely to see these ecosystems as contributing to a pleasant environment. This data underscores the deep-rooted impact that wildlife conflicts can have on community attitudes toward natural surroundings.
Research led by Dincy Mariyam of CWS, alongside co-authors Sumeet Gulati from the University of British Columbia and Krithi K. Karanth from CWS, emphasized the nuances underlying these perceptions. The study examined not just the perceived costs associated with living near forests-such as wildlife-related damages and limited access to essential services-but also the perceived benefits, like the belief that forests play a crucial role in climate regulation and rainfall patterns.
Interestingly, the study found that higher levels of education and income were positively correlated with an increased appreciation for the benefits of forests. Educated individuals were generally more aware of the ecosystem services that forests provide. However, limited local employment options often diminish the willingness of these educated individuals to live near forested areas, as they seek better opportunities in urban centers.
Dr. Mariyam noted, “With the progress in education reaching rural areas, a significant number of individuals now aspire to relocate to metropolitan regions for better opportunities. Engaging in dialogue with these communities could enhance conservation efforts through the development of local employment opportunities, tourism initiatives, agroforestry, or by implementing incentives for land conservation near forests.”
CWS highlighted the urgent need for strategies focused on mitigating wildlife conflicts and enhancing livelihoods linked to forests. Fostering local support for conservation efforts can hinge on addressing these issues, allowing communities to coexist harmoniously with their natural surroundings.
This research brings to light the complexities of conservation efforts, illustrating that positive relationships between communities and forests are often overshadowed by negative experiences. As these findings circulate, they may inspire new approaches to bridge the gap between wildlife conservation and community well-being, ultimately leading to more sustainable interactions with nature.
Published on August 5, 2025, this study not only sheds light on local attitudes towards forests but also serves as a crucial reminder of the delicate balance needed to ensure ongoing support for conservation initiatives while providing communities with viable alternatives and opportunities.
Original Source: https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/bangalore/landowners-who-faced-wildlife-conflicts-less-likely-to-feel-positive-about-forests-study/article69893511.ece
Category : Bengaluru
Tags:
Publish Date: 2025-08-05 06:04:00
