A recent incident in Assam, where a respected physician was humiliated by a magistrate, has sparked significant public outcry and deeper discussions about dignity, workplace abuse, and power dynamics. One observer aptly remarked, “Magistrates may come and go, but a snake-bite specialist is far more indispensable to society.” This article shifts the focus away from that specific event to examine the pervasive issue of workplace bullying and psychological abuse arising from hierarchical power structures.
Power can evoke both compassion and cruelty, influenced by individual traits and the work environment. Leaders often lose their natural empathetic responses, especially as they ascend organizational hierarchies. They may feel invulnerable, above reproach, and sometimes exhibit narcissistic or dominant traits, believing specific groups rightly deserve to lead while others are meant to follow. In toxic workplace cultures, such attitudes can proliferate, making bullying not merely a consequence but an epidemic. In these settings, passive leadership allows abusive behavior to thrive unchecked.
Workplace harassment tends to be chronic and targeted, often institutionalized. It manifests in various forms ranging from verbal insults to intimidation and even physical threats. This dynamic fosters a power imbalance where affected employees become submissive to their abusers, embodying the classic bullying scenario. Research indicates that those with high empathy-often anxious, sensitive, and morally driven-are frequent targets, as bullies typically select individuals less likely to retaliate. The repercussions for victims can be severe, including depression, insomnia, diminished self-esteem, and overall job dissatisfaction. Long-term, such bullying adversely impacts workplace morale, productivity, and institutional credibility. Unfortunately, it rarely occurs in isolation; many bystanders, including supervisors, choose to ignore it, perpetuating a culture of silence where both men and women can be complicit.
Why do individuals resort to bullying in the workplace? Factors like job insecurity and overwhelming workloads can be catalysts, though they never justify such behavior. Various psychological triggers behind abusive conduct include the dehumanization of others, reduced accountability where power creates a sense of exemption from rules, narcissism among those who seek power, social dominance orientation where individuals feel compelled to dominate, and insecurity in leadership that drives individuals to harass subordinates to reclaim control.
In another tragic incident from Assam, a female engineer reportedly took her own life after enduring persistent psychological harassment from her superiors. This raises the question: should we label it simply as suicide, or is it more fittingly termed “bullycide”? The term “bullycide” was introduced by journalists Neil Marr and Tim Field in their 2001 book, “Bullycide: Death at Playtime,” originally focusing on suicides related to school bullying. However, it has become relevant in the corporate settings marked by toxic behaviors. In a heartbreaking case, a 27-year-old woman named Shivani, who worked at a bank in Noida, named five colleagues in her suicide note, detailing daily humiliation and psychological torment. These incidents are not isolated but part of a broader, systemic issue.
Victims of bullycide endure prolonged abuse that leaves them feeling emotionally shattered and hopeless. When they speak out, they often confront institutional retaliation, fostering an environment of fear and complicity. This dynamic, referred to as institutional betrayal, occurs when frameworks designed to protect instead side with the abuser. Prolonged harassment can lead to learned helplessness-a state where victims cease to believe that escape is attainable, resulting in despair not just about their employment but life itself.
While issues of corruption may have influenced the engineer’s case, it is essential to acknowledge the mental harassment stemming from coercive institutional practices. Numerous individuals from diverse backgrounds, including PhD students and corporate employees, are living through these silent crises without support.
In India, unlike the legal protections established for sexual harassment under the POSH Act of 2013, no comprehensive law addresses workplace psychological harassment or bullying. Victims often have to depend on their organizations’ cultures or internal HR policies, which frequently let them down. A culture of silence prevails, wherein colleagues remain mute, fearing for their jobs. To dismantle this culture, we must advocate for essential measures such as a national anti-bullying law addressing all workplace abuses, anonymous reporting mechanisms with anti-retaliation safeguards, mandatory anti-bullying training for HR personnel, and 24/7 bullycide prevention helplines. Collaboration with international organizations to implement best practices in Assam and beyond is also needed.
Raising awareness about bullycide is crucial. If companies benefit from resources and land, they must be held accountable for fostering respectful workplace cultures. Should they fail, government intervention is vital in developing policies, training, and enforcement. Ultimately, this issue transcends individual experiences; it is a societal concern. The hidden trauma from bullying leaves a lasting impact. Lasting change can only be envisioned when citizens, institutions, and governments unite against power abuse. Silence assists the abuser, not the abused; we must refuse to be bystanders.
Original Source: https://nenow.in/opinion/beyond-bullying-tragic-reality-of-bullycide-and-power-abuse-in-workplace.html
Category: Assam,Opinion
Tags:
Publish Date: 2025-08-11 23:17:00
