Delhi Court Rejects Christian Michel’s Plea: A Turning Point in the AgustaWestland VVIP Chopper Saga
A Delhi court has denied the release of Christian Michel James, the alleged intermediary in the controversial AgustaWestland VVIP chopper deal, stating that he has not yet completed the maximum sentence for the charges against him. Special Judge Sanjay Jindal, in an order dated August 7, dismissed Michel’s plea for release under Section 436A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The court emphasized that, due to serious allegations under Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which could lead to life imprisonment, Michel does not qualify to claim he has served the required custody period.
Michel, who was extradited from Dubai in December 2018, argued that his nearly seven years in judicial custody were sufficient for release under Section 436A CrPC. This provision allows undertrial prisoners to seek release if they have served more than half of their maximum sentence. However, the court determined that the severity of the charges against him, particularly the forgery allegations under Section 467 of the IPC, disqualified him from benefiting from this provision. The judge clarified that it remains to be seen if these charges will stand during the charge-framing stage, which means they cannot be dismissed at this time.
Higher courts have previously reviewed Michel’s request for release, with both the Supreme Court of India and the Delhi High Court rejecting his appeal. His argument for relief under Section 436A had been categorically denied, emphasizing the inclusion of non-bailable offenses that alone can carry longer prison terms, including those under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Despite being granted bail earlier this year in both the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Enforcement Directorate (ED) cases, Michel remains incarcerated in Tihar Jail. The Supreme Court approved his bail in the CBI case in February 2025, and he subsequently received bail from the Delhi High Court in the ED case two weeks later. Reports indicate that Michel has yet to furnish the necessary bail bonds, due to unresolved passport-related formalities.
The allegations against Michel stem from his role as a key intermediary in the AgustaWestland VVIP helicopter deal from 2010, which purportedly caused a loss of approximately €398.21 million, or around ₹2,666 crore, to the Indian government. Additionally, the ED’s chargesheet filed in June 2016 claims Michel received €30 million (around ₹225 crore) in kickbacks from the deal, with the money allegedly funneled through a convoluted network of companies.
As the legal battle continues, Michel’s case remains a focal point in discussions regarding corruption and accountability in high-stakes government contracts in India. The decision by the Delhi court highlights ongoing concerns about judicial processes related to serious allegations and the implications for those involved in such high-profile cases.
Original Source: https://www.livemint.com/news/agustawestland-vvip-chopper-deal-case-delhi-court-denies-christian-michel-s-plea-for-release-11754671328975.html
Category :
Tags:
Publish Date: 2025-08-08 22:21:00
