Delimitation Deadline: Compromising Harmony in Manipur’s Political Landscape
Delimitation Commission Initiates Changes in Manipur’s Parliamentary and Assembly Seats
The Delimitation Commission, tasked with adjusting the boundaries of parliamentary and assembly constituencies to ensure a fair representation of the population, has set its sights on Manipur. The move, initiated by the Supreme Court, aims to equally distribute the population among parliamentary and assembly seats, a process that has been underway in other northeastern states, including Assam, Arunachal, and Nagaland.
The delimitation exercise, guided by the Delimitation Commission Act, is not without controversy. Some political parties in Manipur, particularly those with a strong Valley-based presence, have expressed concerns that the process could result in the loss of assembly seats to the hill districts, which have experienced higher population growth rates. This, they argue, could lead to a loss of representation for the Valley.
However, it is crucial to consider the broader implications of delaying the delimitation exercise. The Supreme Court’s direction to implement constitutional provisions for justice and fair play to the people of Manipur should not be obstructed. As the SC itself, “Opposing the overdue delimitation directed by the SC would be unconstitutional and smacks of foul play by the dominant community.”
The Delimitation Commission’s guidelines and methodology prioritize equal distribution of population among parliamentary and assembly seats, with a tolerance of ±10% deviation from the state average population. In addition, the Commission has emphasized the importance of maintaining the integrity of administrative units, such as sub-divisions, and ensuring that these units are contiguous and convenient for the population they serve.
In an effort to promote fairness and give voice to all sections of the population, the Commission has taken into account the 2001 Census population figures. However, it is important to acknowledge that this exercise is not a panacea for all issues. As the 84th Amendment to the Constitution has provided for a freeze on the total number of seats in each state until 2026, the exclusions in this exercise are largely limited to the alteration of constituency boundaries.
Ultimately, the delimitation exercise in Manipur is not about the number of assembly seats, but about ensuring that every citizen has a fair and equal representation in the democratic process. By implementing the SC’s direction, the people of Manipur will benefit from a more representative system, one that reflects their diversity and ensures their voices are heard.
As the SC has emphasized, “the rule of law has to be accepted and followed by the dominant community if Manipur has to remain as a single entity.” It is crucial that the Valley and hill districts, as well as all sections of the population, work together to promote fairness, equity, and justice in the democratic process.
Original Source: https://www.morungexpress.com/conflicting-political-interests-in-manipur-on-delimitation
Category : Public Space
Tags:
Publish Date: 2025-03-28 18:24:00